<

Overview :: Hackem FC

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Franco Constanzo K 26 8 17 83.72%         6.94 -1.06 (-13.24%)
Daminous Chiotis K 22 4 4 15.38%         5.00 +1.00 (25.00%)
Marcel Thuram D 31 8 18 95.51%         9.56 +1.56 (19.44%)
Vidar Rognstad D 31 8 6 24.42%         8.50 +0.50 (6.25%)
Isaac Okoronkwo D 24 7 18 99.10%   1 (0.06) 2 (0.11) 2 (0.11) 8.28 +1.28 (18.25%)
Sebastian Ekecrantz D 33 7 3 7.12%         7.33 +0.33 (4.76%)
Frederick Risp D 21 6 18 93.42%   1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 1 (0.06) 6.39 +0.39 (6.48%)
Ze Elias M 32 10 18 96.95%   1 (0.06) 8 (0.45) 8 (0.45) 10.33 +0.33 (3.33%)
Percy Vasa M 31 10 18 98.68% 1 (0.06) 5 (0.28) 5 (0.28) 6 (0.33) 10.39 +0.39 (3.89%)
Mark Kerr M 23 8 14 76.84% 6 (0.43) 13 (0.93) 3 (0.21) 9 (0.64) 9.57 +1.57 (19.64%)
Wael Rayad M 20 7 18 97.79% 4 (0.23) 10 (0.56) 5 (0.28) 9 (0.51) 8.44 +1.44 (20.63%)
Jonas Lunden M 22 6 16 81.69% 1 (0.07) 5 (0.34) 3 (0.20) 4 (0.27) 6.88 +0.88 (14.58%)
Evaristo Figueiró M 35 6 3 3.47%         6.67 +0.67 (11.11%)
Joe Åhrén M 17 4 2 6.82%         5.50 +1.50 (37.50%)
Giacomo Bonfiglio M 18 4 2 11.01%         4.00 -
Justin Georcelin S 25 9 17 91.98% 11 (0.66) 29 (1.74)   11 (0.66) 9.88 +0.88 (9.80%)
Alberto Poggi S 30 8 9 19.15% 2 (0.58) 2 (0.58)   2 (0.58) 8.22 +0.22 (2.78%)
Cherno Samba S 19 6 18 87.07% 6 (0.38) 8 (0.51) 1 (0.06) 7 (0.44) 6.89 +0.89 (14.81%)
60.56% 31 75 28 59 7.71 + 0.75 (12.06%)
  1. Pompey FC - Hackem FC (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  2. Hackem FC - DibDab II (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  3. Under Dogs - Hackem FC (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Hackem FC - Hutchie Vale (5 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  5. RCD Hamada - Hackem FC (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Hackem FC - Renegades (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  7. Lost and Confused - Hackem FC (1 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Hackem FC - Fat Dog Big Rovers res (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  9. Hackem FC - Arkham Inmates XI (2 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  10. Arkham Inmates XI - Hackem FC (3 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  11. Fat Dog Big Rovers res - Hackem FC (4 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  12. Hackem FC - Lost and Confused (1 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  13. Renegades - Hackem FC (2 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  14. Hackem FC - RCD Hamada (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  15. Hutchie Vale - Hackem FC (3 - 6) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  16. Hackem FC - Under Dogs (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  17. DibDab II - Hackem FC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  18. Hackem FC - Pompey FC (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top