| < | Overview :: Wanderers F.C. |
> |
| Name | Position | Age | Skill | Special | # | Pitch time | Goals | Chances | Assists | A. Chances | Avg. grade | Performance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Willoughby | K | 36 | 9 | |
5 | 49.89% | 9.36 | +0.36 (4.00%) | |||||
| Daniel Uvarez | K | 24 | 8 | |
5 | 49.89% | 7.08 | -0.92 (-11.50%) | |||||
| Cal Routledge | D | 23 | 9 | |
10 | 99.78% | 1 (0.10) | 1 (0.10) | 9.79 | +0.79 (8.78%) | |||
| Serafim Pina | D | 25 | 8 | |
9 | 89.80% | 7.58 | -0.42 (-5.28%) | |||||
| Agostinho Bagão | D | 26 | 7 | |
9 | 89.80% | 1 (0.11) | 1 (0.11) | 1 (0.11) | 2 (0.22) | 7.09 | +0.09 (1.27%) | |
| Luigi McKeever | M | 25 | 9 | |
10 | 99.78% | 2 (0.20) | 6 (0.60) | 2 (0.20) | 7.95 | -1.05 (-11.67%) | ||
| Miquel Etxeberria | M | 34 | 8 | |
10 | 99.78% | 3 (0.30) | 2 (0.20) | 2 (0.20) | 8.31 | +0.31 (3.88%) | ||
| Teddy Abell | M | 25 | 8 | |
10 | 99.78% | 1 (0.10) | 6 (0.60) | 1 (0.10) | 2 (0.20) | 8.13 | +0.13 (1.62%) | |
| Zac Efron | M | 21 | 7 | |
1 | 9.98% | 1 (1.00) | 1 (1.00) | 1 (1.00) | 8.50 | +1.50 (21.43%) | ||
| Jody Ashford | M | 34 | 6 | |
6 | 51.19% | 1 (0.19) | 4 (0.78) | 1 (0.19) | 6.80 | +0.80 (13.33%) | ||
| Dean Dhall | S | 34 | 8 | |
7 | 69.85% | 3 (0.43) | 7 (1.00) | 3 (0.43) | 7.31 | -0.69 (-8.57%) | ||
| Gil Moitoso | S | 23 | 7 | |
3 | 28.63% | 3 (1.05) | 1 (0.35) | 1 (0.35) | 6.47 | -0.53 (-7.62%) | ||
| 69.85% | 9 | 31 | 6 | 15 | 7.86 | + 0.03 ( 0.81%) |
Wanderers F.C. - Quadrophenia (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
Honolulu Generals FC - Wanderers F.C. (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
Luthers Legends - Wanderers F.C. (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
Wanderers F.C. - Head Bopping Cobras (0 - 2) [5-3-2 vs 4-5-1]
Night Predators - Wanderers F.C. (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
Wanderers F.C. - Night Predators (2 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]
Head Bopping Cobras - Wanderers F.C. (0 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
Eliminators - Wanderers F.C. (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 5-3-2]
Wanderers F.C. - Luthers Legends (1 - 3) [5-3-2 vs 4-5-1]
Wanderers F.C. - Tottenham Hotspur (0 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]