<

Overview :: Dynamite Moscow

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Jed Jasper K 26 6 10 82.09%         4.33 -1.67 (-27.83%)
Tobias Oliva K 34 6 3 17.52%         2.40 -3.60 (-60.00%)
Vadim Svirin D 29 8 2 18.11%         7.85 -0.15 (-1.87%)
Eduard Desnitsky D 28 7 10 90.55% 1 (0.10) 1 (0.10)   1 (0.10) 6.96 -0.04 (-0.57%)
Franck Asmus D 26 7 11 99.61%     1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 7.19 +0.19 (2.73%)
Maurio De Cicco D 26 7 11 99.61%   1 (0.09) 3 (0.27) 3 (0.27) 6.87 -0.13 (-1.82%)
Endre Wallman D 25 7 10 82.68%     1 (0.11) 1 (0.11) 6.67 -0.33 (-4.71%)
Samim Gencebay D 26 6 1 7.87%         7.10 +1.10 (18.33%)
Basim Wasim M 26 7 11 99.61% 3 (0.27) 9 (0.82) 4 (0.36) 7 (0.64) 6.73 -0.27 (-3.90%)
Lucas Claesson M 25 7 10 90.55% 2 (0.20) 2 (0.20) 1 (0.10) 3 (0.30) 4.95 -2.05 (-29.29%)
Thomas Philipsson M 29 7 11 99.61% 2 (0.18) 7 (0.64) 3 (0.27) 5 (0.45) 6.78 -0.22 (-3.12%)
Tukino Sirin M 28 7 9 81.50% 2 (0.22) 5 (0.56) 3 (0.33) 5 (0.56) 5.72 -1.28 (-18.25%)
Kirill Neverovsky M 24 6 2 9.15%   2 (1.98)     4.25 -1.75 (-29.17%)
Gunvald Nordgren M 27 6   1 9.06% 1 (1.00) 2 (2.00)   1 (1.00) 8.60 +2.60 (43.33%)
Nicu Atanasiu S 28 7 11 99.61% 9 (0.82) 12 (1.09) 1 (0.09) 10 (0.91) 7.07 +0.07 (1.04%)
Lucio Osorio S 26 6 9 77.85% 3 (0.35) 7 (0.81) 1 (0.12) 4 (0.47) 5.06 -0.94 (-15.74%)
Evgeny Matrosov S 30 6 3 21.75%   2 (0.83)     5.77 -0.23 (-3.89%)
63.93% 23 50 18 41 6.14 -0.51 (-7.93%)
  1. Garrowhill Young Team - Dynamite Moscow (0 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  2. Class Act - Dynamite Moscow (2 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 5-4-1]
  3. Dynamite Moscow - Crossers (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  4. Dynamite Moscow - Suicide Bombers (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  5. Dynamite Moscow - Glasvegas (1 - 3) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  6. Glasvegas - Dynamite Moscow (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  7. Suicide Bombers - Dynamite Moscow (1 - 6) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Crossers - Dynamite Moscow (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. Dynamite Moscow - Class Act (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  10. Dynamite Moscow - Garrowhill Young Team (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  11. The Tic - Dynamite Moscow (0 - 4) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top