<

Overview :: Ritor FC

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Kristian Elling K 30 10 7 99.08%         10.29 +0.29 (2.86%)
Kahraman Serdaroglu D 28 9 7 99.08% 1 (0.14) 9 (1.29)   1 (0.14) 10.29 +1.29 (14.29%)
Andrzej Slawik D 29 9 5 64.92%   1 (0.22)     10.80 +1.80 (20.00%)
Kerim Arslan D 30 8 7 99.08%     1 (0.14) 1 (0.14) 8.43 +0.43 (5.36%)
Ferhat Türkes D 27 7 7 96.77%   1 (0.15) 1 (0.15) 1 (0.15) 9.43 +2.43 (34.69%)
Serdar Kücük D 20 6 3 42.46%         7.00 +1.00 (16.67%)
Gazi Usman D 30 5 2 8.15%         6.00 +1.00 (20.00%)
Gökhan Yasar M 21 8 6 84.77% 3 (0.50) 6 (1.00)   3 (0.50) 9.00 +1.00 (12.50%)
Nazmi Poyrazoglu M 33 8 3 42.46% 2 (0.67) 4 (1.33)   2 (0.67) 10.00 +2.00 (25.00%)
Tadeo Olaizola M 25 8 7 99.08%   2 (0.29) 2 (0.29) 2 (0.29) 9.71 +1.71 (21.43%)
Özer Serhat M 22 8 7 89.85% 1 (0.16) 1 (0.16) 1 (0.16) 2 (0.32) 8.29 +0.29 (3.57%)
Shaban Camka M 25 7 7 94.15%   1 (0.15) 2 (0.30) 2 (0.30) 7.86 +0.86 (12.24%)
Montrel Negro M 25 5 1 0.15%         6.00 +1.00 (20.00%)
Ivanildo Camacho S 27 11 7 97.85% 1 (0.14) 4 (0.58)   1 (0.14) 9.71 -1.29 (-11.69%)
Titus Brigden S 25 8 6 72.00%   2 (0.39)     8.00 -
72.66% 8 31 7 15 8.72 + 0.99 (14.07%)
  1. Ritor FC - Irish Wolfhounds (0 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  2. Nells Nockers - Ritor FC (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Country Hoose Joose - Ritor FC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Arctic Wolves - Ritor FC (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  5. Ritor FC - DangerDucks (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  6. Ritor FC - Celta Vigo (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  7. Lokomotive Leipzig - Ritor FC (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top