<

Overview :: Team Ardbeg

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Filip Hagman K 34 12 29 97.92%         12.63 +0.63 (5.29%)
Niels Schreuder K 20 4 1 1.19%         3.60 -0.40 (-10.00%)
George MacTaggart D 31 12 29 97.33% 2 (0.07) 6 (0.21) 1 (0.04) 3 (0.11) 11.19 -0.81 (-6.72%)
Zivorad Tesovic D 26 11 12 37.63% 1 (0.09) 2 (0.18)   1 (0.09) 8.56 -2.44 (-22.20%)
Aki-Petteri Hauska D 35 11 17 51.60% 1 (0.07) 1 (0.07)   1 (0.07) 11.43 -0.45 (-3.82%)
Martin Donaldsson D 32 11 23 73.59%   1 (0.05) 1 (0.05) 1 (0.05) 12.28 +1.28 (11.66%)
Gerald Pique D 30 11 25 83.21%   1 (0.04) 2 (0.08) 2 (0.08) 11.76 +0.76 (6.95%)
Jaan Gentenaar D 19 5 6 3.86%         5.83 +0.83 (16.67%)
Gert Zuidam D 18 5 1 3.42%         4.80 -0.20 (-4.00%)
Highland Park D 17 4 3 7.28%         5.53 +1.53 (38.33%)
Andres Iniesta M 34 13 29 90.27% 8 (0.30) 23 (0.87) 6 (0.23) 14 (0.53) 14.10 +1.10 (8.44%)
Xavi Hernandes M 35 12 26 76.67% 4 (0.18) 11 (0.49) 9 (0.40) 13 (0.58) 12.30 -0.55 (-4.08%)
Gareth Bale M 26 11 27 86.33% 2 (0.08) 8 (0.32) 7 (0.28) 9 (0.36) 11.87 +0.87 (7.95%)
Tom Huddelstone M 28 11 23 70.77% 4 (0.19) 6 (0.29) 4 (0.19) 8 (0.39) 11.67 +1.53 (15.39%)
Miklos Salonnás M 26 11 12 30.09% 2 (0.23) 5 (0.57) 3 (0.34) 5 (0.57) 9.62 -0.71 (-6.70%)
Lucas Lagartinho M 33 11 11 27.53%   4 (0.50) 3 (0.37) 3 (0.37) 12.13 +0.22 (1.89%)
José Luis Peratta M 19 6 18 28.53% 2 (0.24) 3 (0.36)   2 (0.24) 5.41 +0.18 (4.04%)
Patric Veldman M 17 4 1 1.15%         4.70 +0.70 (17.50%)
Darcy Holbrook S 31 14 29 85.70% 12 (0.48) 31 (1.24) 3 (0.12) 15 (0.60) 14.43 +0.43 (3.05%)
Morgan Ros S 31 13 24 59.18% 10 (0.58) 21 (1.21) 3 (0.17) 13 (0.75) 13.55 +0.55 (4.20%)
Agostinho Rangel S 32 9 2 4.09% 1 (0.84) 1 (0.84)   1 (0.84) 8.75 -0.25 (-2.78%)
Eurico Fredson S 21 7 22 39.30% 2 (0.17) 4 (0.35)   2 (0.17) 6.62 -0.38 (-5.45%)
Isac Skog S 20 6 13 25.15%   2 (0.27)     6.03 +0.03 (0.51%)
47.03% 51 130 42 93 9.51 + 0.19 ( 3.31%)
  1. Homing Homers - Team Ardbeg (3 - 1) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Team Ardbeg - Shankly`s (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  3. Team Ardbeg - Bhattipool FC (7 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  4. Team Ardbeg - Shankly`s (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  5. Spurv FK - Team Ardbeg (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Team Ardbeg - Corleone City (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  7. Team Ardbeg - Homing Homers (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  8. Corleone City - Team Ardbeg (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. Strømmen IF - Team Ardbeg (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  10. Corleone City - Team Ardbeg (3 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  11. Team Ardbeg - Romerike Officers (1 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 5-3-2]
  12. Team Ardbeg - Linde de Bergeino (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 5-4-1]
  13. Vålerengens IF - Team Ardbeg (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  14. Team Ardbeg - Vålerengens IF (2 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  15. Strømmen IF - Team Ardbeg (3 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  16. Linde de Bergeino - Team Ardbeg (2 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  17. Romerike Officers - Team Ardbeg (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  18. Team Ardbeg - Fjerdingby FK (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  19. Team Ardbeg - Corleone City (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  20. Fjerdingby FK - Team Ardbeg (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  21. Team Ardbeg - Strømmen IF (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  22. Team Ardbeg - Corleone City (0 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 3-4-3]
  23. Corleone City - Team Ardbeg (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  24. Homing Homers - Team Ardbeg (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  25. Team Ardbeg - Spurv FK (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  26. Shankly`s - Team Ardbeg (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  27. Team Ardbeg - Veni Vidi Fiasco (3 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  28. Dream Team - Team Ardbeg (1 - 4) [5-4-1 vs 3-5-2]
  29. Team Ardbeg - Dream Team (7 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top