| < | Overview :: Shankly`s |
> |
| Name | Position | Age | Skill | Special | # | Pitch time | Goals | Chances | Assists | A. Chances | Avg. grade | Performance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Faustino | K | 32 | 11 | |
17 | 55.76% | 11.66 | +0.66 (6.04%) | |||||
| Ty Lopez | K | 25 | 8 | |
13 | 42.75% | 7.85 | -0.15 (-1.83%) | |||||
| Massimo Zanutta | D | 31 | 12 | |
26 | 87.88% | 1 (0.04) | 3 (0.12) | 3 (0.12) | 4 (0.16) | 13.89 | +1.89 (15.77%) | |
| Phil Neal | D | 26 | 11 | |
27 | 94.99% | 1 (0.04) | 2 (0.07) | 5 (0.19) | 6 (0.22) | 12.03 | +1.92 (19.15%) | |
| Vinnie Hayhurst | D | 31 | 10 | |
28 | 86.81% | 1 (0.04) | 11 (0.45) | 4 (0.16) | 5 (0.20) | 10.75 | +0.75 (7.50%) | |
| Dayan Bassir | D | 33 | 9 | |
4 | 10.98% | 8.70 | -0.30 (-3.33%) | |||||
| Bradley Spink | D | 26 | 8 | |
19 | 59.39% | 1 (0.06) | 1 (0.06) | 8.71 | +1.55 (22.39%) | |||
| Teo Maldonado | D | 22 | 8 | |
16 | 36.29% | 2 (0.19) | 2 (0.19) | 7.16 | +0.03 (0.33%) | |||
| Thorvald Lerseth | M | 31 | 10 | |
27 | 94.34% | 3 (0.11) | 12 (0.45) | 3 (0.11) | 6 (0.22) | 10.19 | +1.08 (11.93%) | |
| Severin Nobel | M | 30 | 9 | |
25 | 86.88% | 5 (0.20) | 13 (0.53) | 3 (0.12) | 8 (0.32) | 9.50 | +0.50 (5.51%) | |
| Kjell Baconsen | M | 33 | 9 | |
28 | 93.35% | 8 (0.30) | 18 (0.68) | 2 (0.08) | 10 (0.38) | 9.63 | +0.63 (6.98%) | |
| Odd Hellborg | M | 34 | 8 | |
19 | 58.66% | 1 (0.06) | 8 (0.48) | 1 (0.06) | 2 (0.12) | 8.78 | -0.16 (-1.67%) | |
| King Kenny | M | 26 | 8 | |
12 | 37.55% | 2 (0.19) | 3 (0.28) | 3 (0.28) | 8.10 | +0.93 (13.04%) | ||
| Matthew McCullough | M | 33 | 7 | |
13 | 35.26% | 2 (0.20) | 3 (0.30) | 2 (0.20) | 7.45 | +0.45 (6.48%) | ||
| Jon McColl | M | 25 | 7 | |
18 | 44.93% | 3 (0.23) | 7 (0.55) | 3 (0.23) | 6 (0.47) | 7.63 | +0.63 (8.97%) | |
| Stig-Inge Ranvik | M | 21 | 6 | |
7 | 11.09% | 1 (0.32) | 2 (0.63) | 1 (0.32) | 6.94 | +0.94 (15.71%) | ||
| Matias Njøten | M | 20 | 5 | |
1 | 3.52% | 5.90 | +0.90 (18.00%) | |||||
| Robert Bernard Fowler | S | 28 | 10 | |
25 | 87.27% | 7 (0.28) | 24 (0.97) | 2 (0.08) | 9 (0.36) | 10.06 | +0.94 (10.53%) | |
| Gruffyd Llewellyn | S | 31 | 8 | |
17 | 55.91% | 4 (0.25) | 14 (0.88) | 2 (0.13) | 6 (0.38) | 8.89 | +0.89 (11.10%) | |
| 57.03% | 37 | 119 | 34 | 71 | 9.15 | + 0.74 ( 9.08%) |
Team Ardbeg - Shankly`s (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
Strømmen IF - Shankly`s (5 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
Team Ardbeg - Shankly`s (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
Shankly`s - Strømmen IF (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
Skårer Ball - Shankly`s (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
Shankly`s - Corleone City (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
Shankly`s - Skårer Ball (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 5-3-2]
Romerike Officers - Shankly`s (0 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
Romerike Officers - Shankly`s (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
Linde de Bergeino - Shankly`s (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
Shankly`s - Romerike Officers (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
Shankly`s - Vålerengens IF (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
Shankly`s - Spurv FK (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
Homing Homers - Shankly`s (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
Shankly`s - Homing Homers (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
Spurv FK - Shankly`s (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
Skårer Ball - Shankly`s (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
Vålerengens IF - Shankly`s (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
Shankly`s - Skårer Ball (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
Shankly`s - Linde de Bergeino (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
Shankly`s - Strømmen IF (2 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
Shankly`s - Romerike Officers (3 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
Strømmen IF - Shankly`s (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
Corleone City - Shankly`s (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
Strømmen IF - Shankly`s (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
Shankly`s - Team Ardbeg (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
Shankly`s - Romerike Officers (2 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
Corleone City - Shankly`s (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]