<

Overview :: Shankly`s

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Daniel Faustino K 32 11 15 62.05%         11.60 +0.60 (5.45%)
Ty Lopez K 25 8 9 37.23%         9.11 +1.11 (13.89%)
Massimo Zanutta D 31 12 23 93.08% 1 (0.04) 1 (0.04) 3 (0.13) 4 (0.18) 14.74 +2.74 (22.83%)
Phil Neal D 26 11 22 88.85% 2 (0.09) 3 (0.14) 1 (0.05) 3 (0.14) 12.32 +1.32 (11.98%)
Vinnie Hayhurst D 31 10 21 75.76% 1 (0.05) 7 (0.38) 1 (0.05) 2 (0.11) 10.57 +0.57 (5.71%)
Bradley Spink D 26 8 22 68.12%   1 (0.06)     9.00 +1.00 (12.50%)
Teo Maldonado D 22 8 17 54.45%         8.29 +0.29 (3.68%)
Thorvald Lerseth M 31 10 19 66.91% 3 (0.19) 7 (0.43)   3 (0.19) 9.53 -0.47 (-4.74%)
Severin Nobel M 30 9 24 99.28% 2 (0.08) 10 (0.42) 3 (0.12) 5 (0.21) 9.79 +0.79 (8.80%)
Kjell Baconsen M 33 9 24 85.79% 1 (0.05) 6 (0.29) 2 (0.10) 3 (0.14) 9.33 +0.33 (3.70%)
Odd Hellborg M 34 8 13 40.06% 1 (0.10) 6 (0.62) 4 (0.41) 5 (0.52) 8.62 +0.62 (7.69%)
King Kenny M 26 8 21 82.15% 2 (0.10) 8 (0.40) 5 (0.25) 7 (0.35) 8.38 +0.38 (4.76%)
Matthew McCullough M 33 7 4 12.90%         5.50 -1.50 (-21.43%)
Jon McColl M 25 7 15 44.42% 1 (0.09) 4 (0.37) 1 (0.09) 2 (0.19) 8.27 +1.27 (18.10%)
Stig-Inge Ranvik M 21 6 7 23.52%   2 (0.35)     7.86 +1.86 (30.95%)
Robert Bernard Fowler S 28 10 22 85.25% 9 (0.44) 20 (0.97) 2 (0.10) 11 (0.53) 9.91 -0.09 (-0.91%)
Gruffyd Llewellyn S 31 8 15 34.13%   5 (0.61) 1 (0.12) 1 (0.12) 8.47 +0.47 (5.83%)
Conor MacCoubrey S 22 7 9 25.72% 1 (0.16) 3 (0.48)   1 (0.16) 7.44 +0.44 (6.35%)
Santino Cimarelli S 24 6 5 12.41%         6.40 +0.40 (6.67%)
57.48% 24 83 23 47 9.22 + 0.64 ( 7.46%)
  1. Spurv FK - Shankly`s (0 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  2. Linde de Bergeino - Shankly`s (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Shankly`s - Vålerengens IF (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  4. Shankly`s - Linde de Bergeino (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  5. Shankly`s - Homing Homers (3 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  6. Spurv FK - Shankly`s (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  7. Strømmen IF - Shankly`s (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  8. Shankly`s - Spurv FK (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  9. Veni Vidi Fiasco - Shankly`s (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  10. Shankly`s - Bhattipool FC (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  11. Corleone City - Shankly`s (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  12. Shankly`s - Romerike Officers (2 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  13. Team Ardbeg - Shankly`s (6 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  14. Shankly`s - Team Ardbeg (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  15. Romerike Officers - Shankly`s (3 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  16. WeAreUnited - Shankly`s (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  17. Shankly`s - Corleone City (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  18. Shankly`s - WeAreUnited (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  19. Bhattipool FC - Shankly`s (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  20. Shankly`s - Veni Vidi Fiasco (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  21. Shankly`s - Strømmen IF (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  22. Homing Homers - Shankly`s (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  23. Vålerengens IF - Shankly`s (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  24. Shankly`s - Spurv FK (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top