<

Overview :: Linde de Bergeino

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Rodrigo Filho K 25 10 20 67.41% 1 (0.05) 1 (0.05)   1 (0.05) 11.50 +1.50 (15.00%)
Heriberto Lopéz K 29 7 6 17.74%         7.67 +0.67 (9.52%)
Divino Jardel K 18 4 4 14.19%         4.50 +0.50 (12.50%)
Isaias Patiño D 26 11 28 94.68% 1 (0.04) 2 (0.07) 3 (0.11) 4 (0.15) 13.11 +2.11 (19.16%)
Fabricio Polga D 32 10 25 85.19% 1 (0.04) 3 (0.12) 3 (0.12) 4 (0.17) 12.44 +2.44 (24.40%)
Augusto Barbosa D 32 10 26 78.67% 1 (0.05) 4 (0.18) 1 (0.05) 2 (0.09) 12.23 +2.23 (22.31%)
Alessandro Helder D 30 9 17 51.72%   2 (0.14) 3 (0.21) 3 (0.21) 10.59 +1.59 (17.65%)
Anselmo Coco D 28 8 20 64.67% 2 (0.11) 2 (0.11) 1 (0.05) 3 (0.16) 9.50 +1.50 (18.75%)
Felipe Lopes D 22 6 15 33.09%         7.33 +1.33 (22.22%)
Fabio Figallo M 32 11 26 87.58% 3 (0.12) 16 (0.65) 7 (0.28) 10 (0.41) 11.65 +0.65 (5.94%)
Edmundo Gaucho M 31 10 27 91.40% 5 (0.19) 17 (0.66) 6 (0.23) 11 (0.43) 11.30 +1.30 (12.96%)
Marcelo Rocha M 23 8 25 85.19% 5 (0.21) 14 (0.58) 9 (0.37) 14 (0.58) 9.92 +1.92 (24.00%)
Asmar Marcão M 20 7 22 65.95% 3 (0.16) 10 (0.54) 4 (0.22) 7 (0.38) 8.55 +1.55 (22.08%)
Kahraman Karagöl M 20 6 18 39.68% 4 (0.36) 4 (0.36) 3 (0.27) 7 (0.63) 6.72 +0.72 (12.04%)
Fabio Barreto M 19 4 12 27.65% 4 (0.51) 4 (0.51) 3 (0.38) 7 (0.90) 5.08 +1.08 (27.08%)
Paulinho Guimarães S 31 9 25 77.75% 16 (0.73) 38 (1.73) 4 (0.18) 20 (0.91) 10.12 +1.12 (12.44%)
Garrincha Mello S 28 8 14 26.96% 5 (0.66) 7 (0.92) 1 (0.13) 6 (0.79) 9.43 +1.43 (17.86%)
Gunnsaldo Bjansaldo S 22 7 13 32.97% 5 (0.54) 13 (1.40) 2 (0.22) 7 (0.75) 8.08 +1.08 (15.38%)
Daniel Mantega S 29 7 3 7.91% 1 (0.45) 1 (0.45) 1 (0.45) 2 (0.90) 9.00 +2.00 (28.57%)
Gardar Gnom S 20 5 12 32.39% 6 (0.66) 11 (1.20) 4 (0.44) 10 (1.10) 5.92 +0.92 (18.33%)
Fabricio Perreira S 20 4 5 10.18%   2 (0.70)     4.80 +0.80 (20.00%)
52.05% 63 151 55 118 9.02 + 1.35 (18.01%)
  1. Linde de Bergeino - Dream Team (5 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  2. Juventus - Linde de Bergeino (0 - 2) [5-2-3 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Vinger utd - Linde de Bergeino (1 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  4. Linde de Bergeino - Homing Homers (1 - 1) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  5. Linde de Bergeino - Isbjørnene Kjeller (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  6. Homing Homers - Linde de Bergeino (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  7. Linde de Bergeino - Stryn United (1 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  8. Fjerdingby FK - Linde de Bergeino (3 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 3-4-3]
  9. Bhattipool FC - Linde de Bergeino (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  10. Linde de Bergeino - Vålerengens IF (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  11. Linde de Bergeino - Juventus (6 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 5-2-3]
  12. Bhattipool FC - Linde de Bergeino (2 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  13. Skårer Ball - Linde de Bergeino (0 - 5) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  14. Linde de Bergeino - Skårer Ball (6 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  15. Skårer Ball - Linde de Bergeino (0 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  16. Juventus - Linde de Bergeino (0 - 2) [5-3-2 vs 3-4-3]
  17. Linde de Bergeino - Skårer Ball (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  18. Vålerengens IF - Linde de Bergeino (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  19. Linde de Bergeino - Homing Homers (0 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  20. Linde de Bergeino - Bhattipool FC (0 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-5-1]
  21. Homing Homers - Linde de Bergeino (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  22. Linde de Bergeino - Fjerdingby FK (4 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  23. Stryn United - Linde de Bergeino (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  24. Vinger utd - Linde de Bergeino (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  25. Isbjørnene Kjeller - Linde de Bergeino (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  26. Strømmen IF - Linde de Bergeino (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  27. Linde de Bergeino - Vinger utd (6 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  28. Dream Team - Linde de Bergeino (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top