| < | Overview :: Mean Machine |
> |
| Name | Position | Age | Skill | Special | # | Pitch time | Goals | Chances | Assists | A. Chances | Avg. grade | Performance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepe Reina | K | 34 | 15 | |
10 | 89.20% | 12.60 | -2.40 (-16.00%) | |||||
| Damon Ewing | K | 20 | 4 | |
1 | 9.20% | 3.00 | -1.00 (-25.00%) | |||||
| Micah Richards | D | 33 | 15 | |
10 | 89.84% | 11.90 | -3.10 (-20.67%) | |||||
| Gareth Bale | D | 33 | 13 | |
8 | 65.13% | 10.00 | -3.00 (-23.08%) | |||||
| Osório Pires | D | 29 | 13 | |
10 | 87.59% | 10.60 | -2.40 (-18.46%) | |||||
| Matty McClare | D | 22 | 8 | |
9 | 88.56% | 5.44 | -2.56 (-31.94%) | |||||
| Lionel Messi | M | 33 | 14 | |
9 | 88.56% | 1 (0.11) | 1 (0.11) | 9.33 | -4.67 (-33.33%) | |||
| Cesc Fabregas | M | 32 | 13 | |
10 | 98.40% | 10.40 | -2.60 (-20.00%) | |||||
| Pedro Rodriguez | M | 33 | 13 | |
10 | 98.40% | 1 (0.10) | 11.70 | -1.30 (-10.00%) | ||||
| Santiago Nesta | M | 23 | 9 | |
9 | 66.31% | 6.67 | -2.33 (-25.93%) | |||||
| Jesse McPhearson | M | 19 | 6 | |
10 | 49.73% | 5.50 | -0.50 (-8.33%) | |||||
| Luis Suarez | S | 32 | 16 | |
10 | 93.05% | 1 (0.11) | 2 (0.21) | 1 (0.11) | 11.80 | -4.20 (-26.25%) | ||
| David Villa | S | 27 | 11 | |
9 | 59.79% | 7.89 | -3.11 (-28.28%) | |||||
| Hjalmar Steensson | S | 22 | 10 | |
10 | 88.13% | 1 (0.11) | 8.40 | -1.60 (-16.00%) | ||||
| Godfrey Tyler | S | 19 | 6 | |
6 | 10.59% | 5.50 | -0.50 (-8.33%) | |||||
| 72.17% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8.72 | -2.35 (-20.77%) |
Chicken Legs - Mean Machine (4 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
Mean Machine - FC Porto (0 - 6) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
Fo1Tboyys Reserve - Mean Machine (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
Mean Machine - Farcelona (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
Mean Machine - Conundra (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
Conundra - Mean Machine (5 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
Farcelona - Mean Machine (3 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
Mean Machine - Fo1Tboyys Reserve (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
FC Porto - Mean Machine (7 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
Mean Machine - Chicken Legs (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]