<

Overview :: Polished Chromium

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Bonifácio Natalino K 32 11 26 23.81%         10.65 +0.42 (4.37%)
Payton Hapgood K 21 7 31 28.10%         5.59 +0.40 (7.91%)
Chuck Liddell K 30 7 21 18.59%         7.84 +0.84 (11.97%)
Gabriel Huntington K 19 5 14 11.42%         4.27 -0.73 (-14.57%)
Douglas Halliwell K 18 4 6 5.72%         3.67 -0.33 (-8.33%)
Sandro Espírito K 19 4 11 10.48%         2.63 -1.37 (-34.32%)
Stewart Acombe D 33 10 37 35.25% 8 (0.22) 29 (0.78) 7 (0.19) 15 (0.41) 10.68 +0.68 (6.76%)
Frankie Edgar D 22 10 99 91.07% 3 (0.03) 5 (0.05) 4 (0.04) 7 (0.07) 8.37 +1.23 (16.23%)
Tihomir Bujosevic D 26 10 57 51.70% 2 (0.04) 8 (0.15) 8 (0.15) 10 (0.18) 9.24 +0.88 (10.45%)
Mel Pepper D 34 9 64 59.00% 4 (0.06) 8 (0.13) 8 (0.13) 12 (0.19) 10.67 +1.20 (12.69%)
Lineu Passos D 19 7 29 23.04%     1 (0.04) 1 (0.04) 6.41 +0.52 (8.92%)
Josh Koscheck D 29 7 55 51.52% 3 (0.06) 6 (0.11) 1 (0.02) 4 (0.07) 7.23 +1.09 (17.44%)
Julian Kielty D 30 6 33 28.25% 1 (0.03) 2 (0.07) 2 (0.07) 3 (0.10) 7.23 +1.50 (25.52%)
Gearalt Hayes D 27 5 25 23.07%     1 (0.04) 1 (0.04) 4.88 -0.12 (-2.32%)
Connor Coyle D 25 5 17 13.91%     1 (0.07) 1 (0.07) 2.66 -2.34 (-46.71%)
Jose Juan Valero D 17 4   3 1.05%         4.00 -
Savino Superbi D 18 4 3 2.86%         5.33 +1.33 (33.33%)
Oskar Mlynarz D 17 3 2 1.78%         4.00 +1.00 (33.33%)
Johnnie Bailey M 30 10 79 71.74% 15 (0.20) 44 (0.58) 18 (0.24) 33 (0.44) 8.76 +0.08 (0.77%)
Richard Dunn M 22 9 93 84.48% 11 (0.12) 31 (0.35) 16 (0.18) 27 (0.30) 7.09 +0.66 (9.75%)
Gerson Laabi M 21 9 61 56.14% 5 (0.08) 19 (0.32) 13 (0.22) 18 (0.31) 7.89 +1.54 (25.60%)
Dean Felter M 32 9 46 41.41% 8 (0.18) 19 (0.44) 9 (0.21) 17 (0.39) 9.02 +0.02 (0.17%)
Otelo Almirante M 24 7 38 32.05% 10 (0.30) 22 (0.65) 8 (0.24) 18 (0.54) 7.08 +0.47 (7.29%)
Peter Kauniainen M 29 7 32 30.25% 6 (0.19) 15 (0.47) 6 (0.19) 12 (0.38) 7.15 +0.15 (2.10%)
Marin Stanca M 19 6 26 19.49% 1 (0.05) 2 (0.10) 1 (0.05) 2 (0.10) 5.46 +0.35 (8.33%)
Anraí Thorsteinsson M 26 6 24 22.03% 3 (0.13) 7 (0.30) 3 (0.13) 6 (0.26) 5.75 +0.38 (6.49%)
Kalle Mustalahti M 18 5 19 11.07% 1 (0.09) 6 (0.52) 1 (0.09) 2 (0.17) 5.11 +0.74 (16.58%)
Petru Prahoveanu M 19 5 3 2.86%         5.00 -
Carl Pearce M 24 5 26 23.19% 2 (0.08) 5 (0.21) 2 (0.08) 4 (0.16) 4.72 -0.28 (-5.69%)
Luke Cadogan M 22 5 14 12.71%         3.49 -0.59 (-14.89%)
Marco Rump M 18 4 6 3.46% 1 (0.28) 1 (0.28) 1 (0.28) 2 (0.55) 4.00 -
Hank Savage S 27 10 59 52.16% 28 (0.51) 79 (1.44) 9 (0.16) 37 (0.68) 8.96 +0.38 (4.77%)
Habib Remch S 20 8 55 45.85% 23 (0.48) 43 (0.89) 5 (0.10) 28 (0.58) 6.53 +0.77 (13.19%)
Walter Schrøder S 32 8 24 20.65% 10 (0.46) 24 (1.11) 4 (0.18) 14 (0.65) 9.23 +0.77 (10.07%)
Steven Whyte S 31 7 29 26.86% 10 (0.35) 33 (1.17) 4 (0.14) 14 (0.50) 6.67 -0.33 (-4.73%)
Jerry Mourne S 21 6 20 18.10% 3 (0.16) 11 (0.58) 2 (0.11) 5 (0.26) 5.49 +0.09 (0.80%)
Milovan Dragovic S 19 5 3 1.13%         4.67 -0.33 (-6.67%)
Ljubinko Trifkovic S 17 5 14 6.45% 1 (0.15) 2 (0.30)   1 (0.15) 4.71 +0.14 (5.00%)
Herve Henrion S 18 5   8 4.48%   3 (0.64) 1 (0.21) 1 (0.21) 4.88 -0.12 (-2.50%)
Scott Melvin S 20 5 10 8.89% 2 (0.21) 10 (1.07)   2 (0.21) 4.90 -0.10 (-2.00%)
Finbar Lunny S 24 5 1 0.95%         3.70 -1.30 (-26.00%)
Braden Thoor S 18 3 12 10.84% 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09)   1 (0.09) 1.73 -1.27 (-42.22%)
25.90% 162 435 136 298 6.13 + 0.22 ( 2.28%)
  1. Pathetic Athletic - Polished Chromium (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Polished Chromium - tldr (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  3. Polished Chromium - Fitton Hill Rangers (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  4. Dezvirgineaza-ma - Polished Chromium (2 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  5. Diablo Bleu - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Polished Chromium - Uppen Atoms (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  7. Polished Chromium - Glasgow Sambas (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Deportivo Wanka - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. Polished Chromium - Deportivo Wanka (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  10. Nac MacFeegles - Polished Chromium (5 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  11. Glasgow Sambas - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  12. Uppen Atoms - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  13. Polished Chromium - Diablo Bleu (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  14. Polished Chromium - Dezvirgineaza-ma (2 - 3) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  15. tldr - Polished Chromium (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  16. Polished Chromium - Pathetic Athletic (2 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  17. Fitton Hill Rangers - Polished Chromium (6 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  18. Jayjays Amateurs - Polished Chromium (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  19. Polished Chromium - Dezvirgineaza-ma (1 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  20. Polished Chromium - Glasgow Sambas (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  21. XE Xperimental - Polished Chromium (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  22. Uppen Atoms - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  23. Polished Chromium - Diablo Bleu (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  24. Polished Chromium - Russia Privjet (3 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  25. Polished Chromium - Legends of Sports (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  26. Deportivo Wanka - Polished Chromium (2 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  27. Polished Chromium - Jambos Jokers (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  28. Polished Chromium - Deportivo Wanka (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  29. Legends of Sports - Polished Chromium (0 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  30. Nordic Dragons - Polished Chromium (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  31. Diablo Bleu - Polished Chromium (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  32. Polished Chromium - Manchester Utd 19 Times (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  33. Polished Chromium - XE Xperimental (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  34. Dezvirgineaza-ma - Polished Chromium (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  35. Polished Chromium - Denzil Athletic (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  36. Polished Chromium - Muff Divers are us. (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  37. Polished Chromium - XE Xperimental (4 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  38. Polished Chromium - Digital Fortress (2 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  39. Polished Chromium - Jambos Jokers (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  40. Manchester Utd 19 Times - Polished Chromium (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  41. Green Bay Packers - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  42. Polished Chromium - Dezvirgineaza-ma (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  43. Polished Chromium - BarcaLlandudno (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  44. Polished Chromium - Barscenal Utd (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  45. Digital Fortress - Polished Chromium (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  46. Polished Chromium - Russia Privjet (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  47. Denzil Athletic - Polished Chromium (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  48. Polished Chromium - F.A (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  49. F.A - Polished Chromium (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  50. Polished Chromium - C.S. Strollers (5 - 6) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  51. Polished Chromium - Denzil Athletic (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  52. Russia Privjet - Polished Chromium (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  53. Polished Chromium - Digital Fortress (1 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  54. Barscenal Utd - Polished Chromium (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  55. Basils Bastards - Polished Chromium (2 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  56. Polished Chromium - Manchester Utd 19 Times (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  57. Polished Chromium - The Companion Cavalry (2 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  58. BarcaLlandudno - Polished Chromium (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  59. Barming FC - Polished Chromium (0 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  60. Polished Chromium - Deportivo Wanka (5 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  61. Swindon Town - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  62. Lazio - Polished Chromium (0 - 3) [4-3-3 vs 4-3-3]
  63. Unbelievable Tekkers FC - Polished Chromium (0 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  64. Polished Chromium - BarcaLlandudno (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  65. Polished Chromium - Snygging United (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  66. Harimau Muda - Polished Chromium (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  67. Polished Chromium - Harimau Muda (1 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 5-3-2]
  68. Snygging United - Polished Chromium (2 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  69. Polished Chromium - Marc (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  70. BarcaLlandudno - Polished Chromium (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  71. Polished Chromium - Unbelievable Tekkers FC (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  72. Polished Chromium - Lazio (2 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  73. Deportivo Wanka - Polished Chromium (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  74. Polished Chromium - Barming FC (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  75. Polished Chromium - Digital Fortress (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  76. Polished Chromium - Cleveland Steamers (0 - 3) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  77. Polished Chromium - Unbelievable Tekkers FC (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  78. Polished Chromium - Newcastle United (7 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  79. Polished Chromium - Team Wolfman (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  80. Olympic Sprinters - Polished Chromium (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  81. Polished Chromium - Barcaloonies (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  82. Polished Chromium - Bear Grylls Piss (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  83. Tokushima Vortis - Polished Chromium (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  84. Eskilsminne IF - Polished Chromium (1 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  85. Polished Chromium - Manchester City (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  86. Manchester City - Polished Chromium (1 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  87. Polished Chromium - Eskilsminne IF (2 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  88. Balls Deep - Polished Chromium (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  89. Polished Chromium - Tokushima Vortis (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  90. Stoney Lads Club - Polished Chromium (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  91. Bear Grylls Piss - Polished Chromium (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  92. Barcaloonies - Polished Chromium (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  93. Polished Chromium - Olympic Sprinters (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  94. Newcastle United - Polished Chromium (0 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  95. Polished Chromium - Snygging United (2 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  96. Polished Chromium - Digital Fortress (0 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  97. Polished Chromium - Tokushima Vortis (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  98. The Companion Cavalry - Polished Chromium (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  99. Eskilsminne IF - Polished Chromium (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  100. Digital Fortress - Polished Chromium (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  101. Halifax Town - Polished Chromium (3 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  102. Manchester City - Polished Chromium (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  103. Polished Chromium - Bengal Barbarians (3 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  104. Polished Chromium - England Legends (2 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top