<

Overview :: Smiling Gargoyles

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Filbert Hanley K 26 12 10 49.67%         13.00 +1.00 (8.33%)
Junior Armstrong K 19 6 9 49.55%         6.44 +0.44 (7.41%)
Lucas Le D 26 13 17 93.71% 2 (0.12) 4 (0.24) 3 (0.18) 5 (0.29) 15.59 +2.59 (19.91%)
Chase Pollard D 33 12 17 93.71% 2 (0.12) 4 (0.24) 2 (0.12) 4 (0.24) 14.29 +2.29 (19.12%)
Tim Smythe D 24 10 16 81.31% 1 (0.07) 2 (0.14)   1 (0.07) 12.81 +2.81 (28.12%)
Jeffrey Matthews D 21 8 15 79.15%     2 (0.14) 2 (0.14) 10.13 +2.13 (26.67%)
Brendon Hartman D 19 5 8 32.47%         6.12 +1.12 (22.50%)
Edward Martin M 30 13 17 84.36% 2 (0.13) 9 (0.59) 3 (0.20) 5 (0.33) 14.18 +1.18 (9.05%)
Darnell Sanford M 29 12 16 88.20% 2 (0.12) 8 (0.50) 2 (0.12) 4 (0.25) 13.50 +1.50 (12.50%)
Alex Beard M 32 12 18 93.59% 4 (0.24) 13 (0.77) 4 (0.24) 8 (0.47) 14.39 +2.39 (19.91%)
Neal Dale M 22 9 16 85.50% 2 (0.13) 6 (0.39) 8 (0.52) 10 (0.64) 11.69 +2.69 (29.86%)
Stewart Santos M 20 7 15 78.19% 3 (0.21) 5 (0.35) 3 (0.21) 6 (0.42) 8.80 +1.80 (25.71%)
Cory Blanchard M 19 5 8 33.19%   1 (0.17)     6.25 +1.25 (25.00%)
Andrew Garner S 29 11 11 51.47% 6 (0.64) 10 (1.07)   6 (0.64) 13.45 +2.45 (22.31%)
Lewis McFadden S 27 10 7 38.59% 4 (0.57) 14 (2.00)   4 (0.57) 13.14 +3.14 (31.43%)
Clyde Valencia S 19 7 6 29.06% 1 (0.19) 10 (1.90)   1 (0.19) 8.67 +1.67 (23.81%)
Red Legg S 17 5 6 29.72%         5.50 +0.50 (10.00%)
64.20% 29 86 27 56 11.06 + 1.82 (20.10%)
  1. Haggis Hunters - Smiling Gargoyles (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  2. Smiling Gargoyles - Barcode 666 (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  3. Smiling Gargoyles - ROM Zimbrul Siret (6 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  4. ROM Rapid Bucuresti - Smiling Gargoyles (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  5. ROE Rock Me Amadeus - Smiling Gargoyles (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  6. Smiling Gargoyles - ROE Pdl Crew (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  7. ROM Galacticos - Smiling Gargoyles (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  8. ROM Botosani - Smiling Gargoyles (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. Smiling Gargoyles - Bannockburn (1 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  10. ROM Evilution - Smiling Gargoyles (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  11. Smiling Gargoyles - ROM Evilution (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  12. Bannockburn - Smiling Gargoyles (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  13. Smiling Gargoyles - ROM Botosani (3 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  14. ROE Pdl Crew - Smiling Gargoyles (0 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  15. Smiling Gargoyles - ROE Rock Me Amadeus (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  16. Smiling Gargoyles - ROM Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  17. ROM Zimbrul Siret - Smiling Gargoyles (4 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  18. Barcode 666 - Smiling Gargoyles (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top