<

Overview :: ROW Tai Po FC

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Vilhelm Møllegård K 23 11 18 93.50%         11.50 +0.50 (4.55%)
Ovídio César D 26 14 18 98.39%     3 (0.17) 3 (0.17) 15.67 +1.67 (11.90%)
Steven Bassett D 30 13 17 93.21% 1 (0.06) 2 (0.12) 1 (0.06) 2 (0.12) 14.41 +1.41 (10.86%)
Tahir Yavas D 21 10 15 54.77%   1 (0.10) 2 (0.20) 2 (0.20) 11.00 +1.00 (10.00%)
Bento Rafael D 22 9 16 67.04%         9.44 +0.44 (4.86%)
Tore Falch-Olsen D 20 8 16 58.76% 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 1 (0.09) 2 (0.19) 9.25 +1.25 (15.62%)
Gonçalo Vitória D 18 6 10 38.86%     1 (0.14) 1 (0.14) 6.00 -
Darwin Doni M 28 15 14 67.88% 2 (0.16) 4 (0.32) 2 (0.16) 4 (0.32) 15.50 +0.50 (3.33%)
Hang Jebat M 34 14 17 93.21% 2 (0.12) 4 (0.24) 4 (0.24) 6 (0.35) 14.94 +0.94 (6.72%)
Darth Sidious M 24 11 18 98.39% 4 (0.22) 5 (0.28) 7 (0.39) 11 (0.61) 13.17 +2.17 (19.70%)
Hélder Vilhena M 18 6 14 53.16% 1 (0.10) 1 (0.10)   1 (0.10) 7.29 +1.29 (21.43%)
Ming Ming Xing M 17 4 3 11.20%   1 (0.49)     5.33 +1.33 (33.33%)
Wan Weng M 18 4 11 48.09% 1 (0.11) 1 (0.11)   1 (0.11) 5.82 +1.82 (45.45%)
Chan Dan M 16 3 9 36.53% 2 (0.30) 2 (0.30) 1 (0.15) 3 (0.45) 4.22 +1.22 (40.74%)
Xiao-Chun Kai M 17 3 1 2.74%         3.00 -
Hang Tuah S 29 14 18 97.56% 14 (0.79) 35 (1.97) 3 (0.17) 17 (0.96) 14.83 +0.83 (5.95%)
Joaquim Merino S 20 8 11 38.62%   1 (0.14) 1 (0.14) 1 (0.14) 8.64 +0.64 (7.95%)
Alex Novaes S 18 5 10 33.79% 3 (0.49) 5 (0.81)   3 (0.49) 6.40 +1.40 (28.00%)
60.32% 31 63 26 57 9.80 + 1.15 (16.90%)
  1. The Bermuda Triangle - ROW Tai Po FC (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. ROW Tai Po FC - ROW Perak (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  3. ROW Tai Po FC - New World Order (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  4. The Rothschilds - ROW Tai Po FC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  5. ROW Australia - ROW Tai Po FC (0 - 5) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  6. ROW Tai Po FC - The Swedish Conspiracy (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  7. ROW Tai Po FC - FC Porto (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  8. ROE Norwegian Scousers - ROW Tai Po FC (0 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. ROW Tai Po FC - ROW Fanatics (2 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  10. ROM Steaua Bucuresti - ROW Tai Po FC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  11. ROW Tai Po FC - ROM Steaua Bucuresti (3 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  12. ROW Fanatics - ROW Tai Po FC (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  13. ROW Tai Po FC - ROE Norwegian Scousers (3 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  14. The Swedish Conspiracy - ROW Tai Po FC (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  15. ROW Tai Po FC - ROW Australia (4 - 1) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  16. ROW Tai Po FC - The Rothschilds (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  17. New World Order - ROW Tai Po FC (0 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  18. ROW Perak - ROW Tai Po FC (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top