<

Overview :: Ramblers FC

>
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Seymour Butts K 34 11 116 73.34%   1 (0.01)     10.89 +1.04 (10.90%)
Artur Nygård K 25 9 38 22.59%         7.47 +0.08 (1.82%)
Sunday Afindeye K 24 6   1 0.65%         3.30 -2.70 (-45.00%)
Valentín Gayoso K 17 4   1 0.65%         2.00 -2.00 (-50.00%)
Marek Streetpreacher K 19 4 4 2.61%         2.88 -0.62 (-13.33%)
Ian Maiden D 28 13 129 80.25% 14 (0.11) 59 (0.48) 11 (0.09) 25 (0.20) 11.96 +1.87 (18.98%)
Denver Randleman D 34 11 140 87.33% 18 (0.13) 70 (0.52) 16 (0.12) 34 (0.25) 11.71 +1.71 (17.43%)
Clinton Baptiste D 34 11 60 38.01% 1 (0.02) 5 (0.09) 7 (0.12) 8 (0.14) 12.29 +1.51 (14.06%)
Van Clomp D 35 10 113 66.14% 1 (0.01) 12 (0.12) 12 (0.12) 13 (0.13) 11.82 +1.82 (18.24%)
John MacGillies D 30 9 86 48.40% 1 (0.01) 4 (0.05) 2 (0.03) 3 (0.04) 9.13 +1.13 (14.35%)
Edith Artois D 35 9 10 6.38%   1 (0.10) 1 (0.10) 1 (0.10) 9.43 +0.43 (4.78%)
Patricio Ubinas D 29 8 10 6.03%   1 (0.11)     7.10 -0.90 (-11.25%)
Dustin Rea D 22 7 41 15.82%   1 (0.04)     6.46 +0.59 (11.13%)
Camilo Horcajada D 28 7 21 13.70% 1 (0.05) 2 (0.10)   1 (0.05) 7.58 +0.86 (13.20%)
Soin Arcaya D 19 6 26 10.60%     2 (0.12) 2 (0.12) 5.77 +0.62 (12.05%)
Julius Willoughby D 26 6   2 1.06%         7.70 +1.70 (28.33%)
William Couraud D 19 5 16 6.53% 1 (0.10) 1 (0.10)   1 (0.10) 4.75 +0.12 (2.81%)
Baiarde Elorriaga D 20 4 2 0.83%         4.00 -
Nexhat Hallaqi D 22 4 3 1.39%         5.10 +1.10 (27.50%)
Pierre Chardar D 17 4 8 3.29%         4.00 -
Dick Morissey D 20 4 14 5.04%         3.86 +0.71 (23.21%)
Saul Hudson M 28 12 126 78.61% 27 (0.22) 77 (0.64) 24 (0.20) 51 (0.42) 10.44 +1.11 (11.73%)
Paulo Martins M 27 12 129 77.67% 11 (0.09) 53 (0.45) 25 (0.21) 36 (0.30) 10.78 +1.35 (14.23%)
Jed Zeppeplin M 31 11 139 85.27% 36 (0.28) 90 (0.69) 34 (0.26) 70 (0.54) 10.38 +1.27 (13.84%)
Lech Zemojtel M 32 11 18 10.32%   8 (0.51) 7 (0.44) 7 (0.44) 10.81 -0.19 (-1.72%)
John Jansen M 25 10 56 33.12% 9 (0.18) 29 (0.57) 14 (0.28) 23 (0.45) 10.93 +1.64 (17.15%)
Zbynek Becka M 33 10 105 65.00% 28 (0.28) 68 (0.68) 23 (0.23) 51 (0.51) 10.79 +0.90 (9.24%)
Konstantin Delic M 24 8 34 20.80% 3 (0.09) 5 (0.16) 6 (0.19) 9 (0.28) 7.87 +0.72 (10.46%)
Joshua Holcomb M 22 7 17 7.57%   1 (0.09)     6.73 +0.08 (1.09%)
Pedro Moutinho M 20 6 48 18.10% 1 (0.04) 7 (0.25) 1 (0.04) 2 (0.07) 5.54 +0.56 (10.76%)
Amedeo Florio M 21 6 16 7.28% 1 (0.09) 4 (0.36) 1 (0.09) 2 (0.18) 6.00 +0.81 (16.04%)
Boban Bonkovic M 22 6 18 8.24% 1 (0.08) 4 (0.32) 2 (0.16) 3 (0.24) 6.41 +0.69 (12.89%)
Punch Vilakazi M 18 4 12 4.93%   2 (0.26)     4.92 +0.92 (22.92%)
Tajo Romerito M 19 3 4 0.79%         3.00 -
Fabio Del Nero S 31 11 127 74.46% 66 (0.58) 160 (1.40) 15 (0.13) 81 (0.71) 10.53 +0.64 (6.16%)
Max Schalk S 24 8 72 43.40% 18 (0.27) 51 (0.77) 4 (0.06) 22 (0.33) 7.27 -0.22 (-2.62%)
Jonathan Munce S 24 8 3 0.84%         6.67 -1.33 (-16.67%)
Zachary Smith S 23 7 61 27.31% 9 (0.22) 25 (0.60) 5 (0.12) 14 (0.33) 6.60 +0.87 (15.29%)
Maxim Oleksienko S 22 7 14 8.11% 3 (0.24) 5 (0.40) 1 (0.08) 4 (0.32) 5.61 -0.03 (0.35%)
Eddie Cavendish S 36 7 4 1.67% 3 (1.17) 6 (2.34)   3 (1.17) 5.30 -1.70 (-24.29%)
Estebe Uribe S 22 6 29 11.27% 3 (0.17) 9 (0.52) 1 (0.06) 4 (0.23) 5.38 +0.07 (2.24%)
Arnulf Jenseg S 20 6 13 4.62% 2 (0.28) 6 (0.85) 2 (0.28) 4 (0.56) 5.62 +0.38 (7.18%)
Eliot Bowcott S 22 6 15 4.30%   3 (0.46)     5.13 +0.07 (1.33%)
Abhimanyu Lahiri S 19 5 11 5.05%   1 (0.13)     4.15 -0.48 (-10.91%)
Dawson Walker S 20 5 5 2.14%   2 (0.61)     5.18 +0.18 (3.60%)
Virgil Stott S 19 5 7 4.16%   3 (0.47) 3 (0.47) 3 (0.47) 5.57 +0.57 (11.43%)
Alfredo Pompedo S 20 5 10 5.62% 1 (0.12) 3 (0.35) 1 (0.12) 2 (0.23) 4.95 +0.35 (9.40%)
Florian Michael S 18 4 9 3.89% 3 (0.50) 7 (1.17)   3 (0.50) 4.44 +0.44 (11.11%)
Custódio da Luz S 21 4 16 7.75% 2 (0.17) 5 (0.42)   2 (0.17) 3.86 +0.23 (6.15%)
Teoman Zengin S 21 4 4 2.33% 1 (0.28) 1 (0.28)   1 (0.28) 4.25 +0.25 (6.25%)
Ayrton Luz S 18 4 7 1.86%   2 (0.70)     3.57 +0.43 (15.48%)
Valentim Jamba S 18 4 6 2.57%         4.00 -
21.53% 265 794 220 485 6.77 + 0.41 ( 5.82%)
  1. THE BLACK NINJAS - The Western District (0 - 4) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  2. The Western District - IBOAB Immediately FC (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  3. Sizzling Ecosse - The Western District (1 - 2) [5-4-1 vs 5-4-1]
  4. The Western District - Mapchester City (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  5. Carlington Juniors - The Western District (0 - 4) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  6. Pink pom poms - The Western District (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  7. The Western District - ZFN (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  8. ZFN - The Western District (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  9. The Western District - Pink pom poms (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  10. The Western District - Carlington Juniors (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  11. Mapchester City - The Western District (1 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  12. The Western District - Sizzling Ecosse (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  13. IBOAB Immediately FC - The Western District (1 - 4) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  14. The Western District - THE BLACK NINJAS (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  15. Brucey Bonus - The Western District (4 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  16. The Western District - Pub Team (3 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  17. The Gamecock Collection - The Western District (2 - 1) [4-2-4 vs 4-3-3]
  18. The Western District - Real Sadrid (3 - 4) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  19. The Western District - Trekies (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  20. Leyton Spurs - The Western District (1 - 3) [5-4-1 vs 4-5-1]
  21. The Western District - Mapchester City (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  22. The Western District - ZFN (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  23. SeaDogs - The Western District (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  24. Fogle Fliers - The Western District (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  25. The Western District - rule supreme (0 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  26. rule supreme - The Western District (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  27. The Western District - Fogle Fliers (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  28. The Western District - SeaDogs (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  29. ZFN - The Western District (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  30. Mapchester City - The Western District (0 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  31. The Western District - Leyton Spurs (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  32. Trekies - The Western District (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  33. hockinghotspurs - The Western District (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  34. Mackem Magic AFC - The Western District (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  35. Snommis Rovers - The Western District (2 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  36. The Western District - Riddlers Army (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  37. The Western District - Fogle Fliers (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  38. Barnes Heroes - The Western District (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  39. Coca Cola Cottagers - The Western District (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  40. Blyth Spartans - The Western District (2 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  41. The Western District - The Neverland Pirates (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  42. The Western District - Snommis Rovers (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  43. The Gamecock Collection - The Western District (1 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 5-3-2]
  44. The Western District - The Gamecock Collection (1 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  45. Snommis Rovers - The Western District (3 - 5) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  46. The Neverland Pirates - The Western District (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  47. The Western District - Blyth Spartans (0 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 5-3-2]
  48. The Western District - Coca Cola Cottagers (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  49. The Western District - Barnes Heroes (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  50. Fogle Fliers - The Western District (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  51. The Western District - Riddlers Army (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  52. The Western District - The Knights of NI (4 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 3-4-3]
  53. The Western District - Blyth Spartans (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  54. Leyton Spurs - The Western District (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  55. The Flying Dutchmen - The Western District (0 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 5-3-2]
  56. Trekies - The Western District (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  57. The Western District - ZFN (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  58. The Western District - Sizzling Ecosse (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  59. SeaDogs - The Western District (2 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  60. The Western District - SeaDogs (0 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  61. Sizzling Ecosse - The Western District (6 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  62. ZFN - The Western District (2 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  63. The Western District - Trekies (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  64. The Western District - The Flying Dutchmen (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  65. The Western District - Leyton Spurs (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  66. Blyth Spartans - The Western District (0 - 3) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  67. The Western District - Brucey Bonus (2 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  68. Krazjk Skward - The Western District (4 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  69. The Western District - Trekies (2 - 1) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  70. The Western District - rule supreme (2 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  71. Nip Slip United - The Western District (0 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  72. The Western District - Sizzling Ecosse (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  73. The Western District - SeaDogs (1 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  74. Fogle Fliers - The Western District (3 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  75. Falcon City Hawks FC - The Western District (0 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  76. The Western District - hockinghotspurs (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  77. hockinghotspurs - The Western District (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  78. The Western District - Falcon City Hawks FC (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  79. The Western District - Fogle Fliers (3 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  80. SeaDogs - The Western District (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  81. Sizzling Ecosse - The Western District (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  82. The Western District - Nip Slip United (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  83. rule supreme - Ramblers FC (1 - 1) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  84. Ramblers FC - Real Sadrid (0 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  85. The Neverland Pirates - Ramblers FC (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  86. Ramblers FC - Sizzling Ecosse (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  87. The Gamecock Collection - Ramblers FC (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  88. Ramblers FC - THE BLACK NINJAS (2 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  89. Ramblers FC - Blyth Spartans (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  90. The Flying Dutchmen - Ramblers FC (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  91. Ramblers FC - ZFN (4 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  92. Happy Mon-days - Ramblers FC (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  93. Ramblers FC - SeaDogs (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  94. Falcon City Hawks FC - Ramblers FC (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  95. Ramblers FC - Falcon City Hawks FC (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  96. SeaDogs - Ramblers FC (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  97. Ramblers FC - Happy Mon-days (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  98. ZFN - Ramblers FC (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  99. Ramblers FC - The Flying Dutchmen (4 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  100. Blyth Spartans - Ramblers FC (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  101. THE BLACK NINJAS - Ramblers FC (2 - 4) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  102. AFC Dribblers - Ramblers FC (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  103. hockinghotspurs - Ramblers FC (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  104. BuildKing Boro - Ramblers FC (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  105. Ramblers FC - Riddlers Army (1 - 5) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  106. Ramblers FC - Sweet Martabak (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  107. Sizzling Ecosse - Ramblers FC (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  108. Ramblers FC - SeaDogs (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  109. Ramblers FC - The Flying Dutchmen (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  110. The Gamecock Collection - Ramblers FC (5 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  111. Fogle Fliers - Ramblers FC (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  112. Ramblers FC - rule supreme (4 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  113. rule supreme - Ramblers FC (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  114. Ramblers FC - Fogle Fliers (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  115. Ramblers FC - The Gamecock Collection (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  116. The Flying Dutchmen - Ramblers FC (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  117. SeaDogs - Ramblers FC (2 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  118. Ramblers FC - Sizzling Ecosse (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  119. Sweet Martabak - Ramblers FC (3 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  120. Ramblers FC - The Neverland Pirates (2 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  121. Carlington FC - Ramblers FC (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  122. Sizzling Ecosse - Ramblers FC (2 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  123. Trekies - Ramblers FC (0 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  124. Ramblers FC - The Gamecock Collection (3 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  125. Trekies - Ramblers FC (1 - 5) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  126. hockinghotspurs - Ramblers FC (2 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  127. Mackem Magic AFC - Ramblers FC (6 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  128. Ramblers FC - Carlington FC (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  129. Ramblers FC - The Top Cats (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  130. Happy Mon-days - Ramblers FC (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  131. Ramblers FC - Happy Mon-days (1 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  132. The Top Cats - Ramblers FC (1 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  133. Carlington FC - Ramblers FC (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-3-3]
  134. Ramblers FC - Mackem Magic AFC (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  135. Ramblers FC - hockinghotspurs (3 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  136. Ramblers FC - Trekies (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  137. The Gamecock Collection - Ramblers FC (5 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  138. Ramblers FC - Cheesy Boys FC (3 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  139. Ramblers FC - Carlington FC (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  140. Ramblers FC - Real Sadrid (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  141. Ramblers FC - Leyton Spurs (1 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 5-4-1]
  142. Ramblers FC - The Gamecock Collection (2 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  143. Sweet Martabak - Ramblers FC (1 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  144. SeaDogs - Ramblers FC (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  145. Fogle Fliers - Ramblers FC (0 - 2) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  146. Ramblers FC - Sizzling Ecosse (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  147. Ramblers FC - The Neverland Pirates (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  148. rule supreme - Ramblers FC (2 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  149. Ramblers FC - rule supreme (1 - 1) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  150. The Neverland Pirates - Ramblers FC (1 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  151. Sizzling Ecosse - Ramblers FC (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  152. Ramblers FC - Fogle Fliers (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top