<

Overview :: The Walking Dead

 >
Name Position Age Skill Special  #  Pitch time Goals Chances Assists A. Chances Avg. grade Performance Status
Jalen Burns K 32 13 61 42.26% 2 (0.03) 2 (0.03)   2 (0.03) 12.80 +0.70 (5.83%)
Danny Trott K 24 10 83 57.50%         8.00 -0.20 (-4.37%)
Arjen de Lange D 33 15 122 83.23% 5 (0.04) 10 (0.08) 8 (0.07) 13 (0.11) 15.25 +1.30 (9.21%)
Guifré Correa D 30 15 120 79.06% 5 (0.04) 13 (0.11) 11 (0.10) 16 (0.14) 15.00 +1.82 (13.42%)
Teo Oliva D 26 14 116 74.97% 2 (0.02) 8 (0.07) 10 (0.09) 12 (0.11) 12.44 +1.38 (12.62%)
Martin Bolland D 25 12 103 62.91% 1 (0.01) 2 (0.02) 4 (0.04) 5 (0.06) 11.13 +1.17 (11.54%)
Daniel Liemer D 24 11 64 42.40% 5 (0.08) 6 (0.10) 1 (0.02) 6 (0.10) 10.60 +1.10 (10.88%)
Bradley Sefton D 34 8 6 4.16%         7.13 -0.87 (-10.83%)
Greg Norris D 20 7 54 21.61%     1 (0.03) 1 (0.03) 6.44 +0.46 (7.62%)
Darryl Lancaster M 35 13 136 93.05% 51 (0.38) 122 (0.91) 24 (0.18) 75 (0.56) 13.11 +0.27 (2.17%)
Dorin Dumitra M 28 13 102 67.04% 10 (0.10) 39 (0.40) 25 (0.26) 35 (0.36) 12.10 +1.28 (12.18%)
Floriano Preto M 24 12 102 62.69% 19 (0.21) 35 (0.39) 13 (0.14) 32 (0.35) 10.16 +0.89 (8.93%)
Steven Challis M 36 12 43 29.50% 6 (0.14) 15 (0.35) 6 (0.14) 12 (0.28) 11.21 -1.34 (-10.62%)
Lúcio Proença M 23 10 86 55.82% 10 (0.12) 24 (0.30) 18 (0.22) 28 (0.35) 9.51 +1.62 (21.03%)
Robbie Hawtin M 35 10 73 48.03% 7 (0.10) 26 (0.38) 17 (0.25) 24 (0.35) 10.66 +0.38 (3.75%)
Quigley Pembridge M 35 10 11 7.62% 1 (0.09) 3 (0.27) 3 (0.27) 4 (0.36) 10.81 +0.81 (8.09%)
Heiko Reder M 36 9 29 18.54% 1 (0.04) 6 (0.22) 2 (0.07) 3 (0.11) 10.77 +0.11 (1.15%)
Vivian Vascomo M 18 7 47 19.65% 3 (0.11) 8 (0.28) 2 (0.07) 5 (0.18) 6.74 +0.94 (16.25%)
Mihail Cristofer M 18 5 31 10.78% 3 (0.19) 5 (0.32)   3 (0.19) 4.48 +0.03 (0.81%)
Antony Headon M 18 4 1 0.69%         6.40 +2.40 (60.00%)
Spencer Stokoe S 33 14 126 80.88% 57 (0.49) 111 (0.95) 24 (0.21) 81 (0.69) 14.58 +1.27 (9.51%)
Jared Harper S 27 13 105 60.68% 25 (0.29) 57 (0.65) 9 (0.10) 34 (0.39) 11.58 +1.05 (9.28%)
Patrick Chopra S 33 10 25 14.82% 5 (0.23) 14 (0.65) 1 (0.05) 6 (0.28) 11.32 +1.32 (13.24%)
Dick Rowlands S 22 8 62 26.34% 6 (0.16) 20 (0.53) 2 (0.05) 8 (0.21) 8.03 +1.06 (16.00%)
Marius Hangiu S 19 6 7 4.85% 2 (0.29) 7 (1.00)   2 (0.29) 4.11 -0.17 (-0.95%)
42.76% 226 533 181 407 10.17 + 0.75 ( 9.07%)
  1. Steel Claymores - The Humble Plumb (5 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  2. Amero FC - The Humble Plumb (0 - 1) [5-2-3 vs 3-5-2]
  3. The Humble Plumb - The Cricketers Arms (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  4. ROE Gooners - The Humble Plumb (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 5-3-2]
  5. The Humble Plumb - Smiling Gargoyles (1 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  6. Blue-Fucsia - The Humble Plumb (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  7. The Humble Plumb - Blue-Fucsia (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  8. Smiling Gargoyles - The Humble Plumb (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  9. The Humble Plumb - ROE Gooners (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  10. The Cricketers Arms - The Humble Plumb (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  11. The Humble Plumb - Amero FC (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  12. ROE Viking Barbarians - The Humble Plumb (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  13. The Humble Plumb - Smiling Gargoyles (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  14. ROW Warriors - The Humble Plumb (0 - 4) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  15. The Humble Plumb - Purple Haze (0 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  16. The Humble Plumb - The Rothschilds (1 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 5-3-2]
  17. FC Rapid Bucuresti - The Humble Plumb (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  18. The Stumble Inn - The Humble Plumb (0 - 5) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  19. The Humble Plumb - The Stumble Inn (7 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-3-3]
  20. The Humble Plumb - FC Rapid Bucuresti (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  21. The Rothschilds - The Humble Plumb (0 - 1) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  22. The Humble Plumb - ROW Warriors (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 5-4-1]
  23. Smiling Gargoyles - The Humble Plumb (0 - 4) [3-4-3 vs 4-5-1]
  24. The Humble Plumb - The Bermuda Triangle (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  25. The Humble Plumb - S.L. Benfica (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  26. The Mucky Duck - The Humble Plumb (4 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  27. The Mucky Duck - The Humble Plumb (2 - 2) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  28. ROW Perak - The Humble Plumb (0 - 0) [3-4-3 vs 4-3-3]
  29. The Humble Plumb - ROW Nippon (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  30. ROE Requiem of Yin-Yang - The Humble Plumb (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  31. S.L. Benfica - The Humble Plumb (5 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 5-4-1]
  32. The Humble Plumb - Alba an Aigh (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 5-3-2]
  33. ROE Kick And Run FC - The Humble Plumb (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  34. The Humble Plumb - NA Sporting KC SC (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  35. ROW Nippon - The Humble Plumb (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  36. The Humble Plumb - ROW Nippon (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  37. NA Sporting KC SC - The Humble Plumb (3 - 4) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  38. The Crooked Spireites - The Humble Plumb (2 - 3) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  39. The Humble Plumb - ROE Kick And Run FC (1 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  40. Alba an Aigh - The Humble Plumb (0 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  41. The Humble Plumb - ROE Requiem of Yin-Yang (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  42. The Cricketers Arms - The Humble Plumb (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  43. Barcode 666 - The Humble Plumb (1 - 1) [5-3-2 vs 3-5-2]
  44. The Humble Plumb - Smiling Gargoyles (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  45. The Humble Plumb - ROW Dark Side (1 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  46. Real Massamá - The Humble Plumb (1 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  47. The Humble Plumb - The Crooked Spireites (4 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-3-3]
  48. Azeitão Champs PT - The Humble Plumb (0 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  49. The Humble Plumb - FC Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 1) [4-3-3 vs 3-5-2]
  50. FC Rapid Bucuresti - The Humble Plumb (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  51. The Humble Plumb - U Cluj (1 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  52. The Crooked Spireites - The Humble Plumb (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  53. The Humble Plumb - Real Massamá (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  54. Smiling Gargoyles - The Humble Plumb (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  55. The Humble Plumb - Barcode 666 (2 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 5-3-2]
  56. The Crooked Spireites - The Humble Plumb (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  57. The Cricketers Arms - The Humble Plumb (1 - 1) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  58. The Humble Plumb - ROW MXL Malaysia (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  59. The Humble Plumb - ROW Warriors (4 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  60. The Humble Plumb - ROW Perak (1 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  61. Sporting Clube Portugal - The Humble Plumb (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  62. The Labour in Vain - The Humble Plumb (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  63. The Humble Plumb - Bannockburn (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-3-3]
  64. U Cluj - The Humble Plumb (3 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  65. FRB Utd - The Humble Plumb (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  66. The Humble Plumb - FRB Utd (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  67. The Humble Plumb - U Cluj (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  68. Bannockburn - The Humble Plumb (1 - 3) [4-3-3 vs 5-4-1]
  69. The Humble Plumb - Sporting Clube Portugal (1 - 0) [5-4-1 vs 4-5-1]
  70. ROW Perak - The Humble Plumb (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 5-4-1]
  71. The Humble Plumb - ROW Perak (1 - 0) [5-3-2 vs 4-4-2]
  72. The Humble Plumb - ROE Deutsche Rapper (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  73. Purple Haze - The Humble Plumb (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  74. The Humble Plumb - FC Young Guns (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  75. ROE Most Wanted - The Humble Plumb (1 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  76. The Humble Plumb - ROE Requiem of Yin-Yang (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  77. The Humble Plumb - FC Rapid Bucuresti (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  78. FC Rapid Bucuresti - The Humble Plumb (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 5-3-2]
  79. ROE Requiem of Yin-Yang - The Humble Plumb (0 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  80. The Humble Plumb - ROE Most Wanted (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  81. FC Young Guns - The Humble Plumb (1 - 6) [4-3-3 vs 4-5-1]
  82. The Humble Plumb - Purple Haze (2 - 1) [5-4-1 vs 4-4-2]
  83. The Humble Plumb - ROE Norwegian Scousers (4 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-3-3]
  84. The Humble Plumb - ROW Tai Po FC (5 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  85. Majestic 12 - The Humble Plumb (2 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  86. ROE Rock Me Amadeus - The Humble Plumb (0 - 3) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  87. The Humble Plumb - ROE Most Wanted (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  88. FC Petrolul Ploiesti - The Humble Plumb (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  89. FC Rapid Bucuresti - The Humble Plumb (3 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  90. FRB Utd - The Humble Plumb (1 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  91. The Humble Plumb - FRB Utd (3 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  92. The Humble Plumb - FC Petrolul Ploiesti (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  93. ROE Most Wanted - The Humble Plumb (2 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-5-1]
  94. The Humble Plumb - Majestic 12 (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  95. ROW Tai Po FC - The Humble Plumb (3 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  96. ROE Maltese Falcon - The Walking Dead (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  97. Butterfly Effect - The Walking Dead (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  98. Conspiracy 58 - The Walking Dead (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-4-3]
  99. The Walking Dead - U Cluj (4 - 3) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  100. The Walking Dead - ROW MXL Malaysia (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  101. The Walking Dead - ROE Norwegian Scousers (6 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  102. Men in Black - The Walking Dead (2 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  103. Madredeus - The Walking Dead (5 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  104. Alcantara C. P. - The Walking Dead (0 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  105. The Walking Dead - Bannockburn (0 - 2) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  106. The Walking Dead - Haggis Hunters (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  107. The Walking Dead - ROW Nippon (6 - 7) [5-3-2 vs 5-4-1]
  108. Haggis Hunters - The Walking Dead (1 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  109. Bannockburn - The Walking Dead (2 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  110. The Walking Dead - Madredeus (0 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  111. The Walking Dead - Men in Black (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-5-1]
  112. ROE Norwegian Scousers - The Walking Dead (1 - 3) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  113. ROW Australia - The Walking Dead (2 - 1) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  114. ROM Zimbrul Siret - The Walking Dead (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  115. The Walking Dead - Conspiracy 58 (0 - 4) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  116. The Walking Dead - ROM Expert (3 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  117. Haggis Hunters - The Walking Dead (4 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  118. The Walking Dead - FC Porto (4 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  119. Haggis Hunters - The Walking Dead (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  120. ROM Galacticos - The Walking Dead (0 - 0) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  121. Majestic 12 - The Walking Dead (2 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  122. The Walking Dead - Alcantara C. P. (4 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  123. The Walking Dead - ROE Public Enemies (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  124. The Walking Dead - ROM Saint Étienne (4 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  125. ROE Most Wanted - The Walking Dead (0 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  126. The Walking Dead - ROE Pdl Crew (3 - 1) [4-4-2 vs 3-4-3]
  127. FC Porto - The Walking Dead (4 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  128. The Walking Dead - ROW Nippon (2 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  129. The Walking Dead - ROE Kick And Run FC (3 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 3-5-2]
  130. The Walking Dead - Amero FC (1 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]
  131. Amero FC - The Walking Dead (4 - 1) [4-5-1 vs 4-4-2]
  132. The Swedish Conspiracy - The Walking Dead (0 - 4) [3-4-3 vs 4-4-2]
  133. ROW Nippon - The Walking Dead (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-5-2]
  134. The Walking Dead - FC Porto (5 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  135. ROM Steaua Bucuresti - The Walking Dead (0 - 1) [3-5-2 vs 4-4-2]
  136. The Walking Dead - ROE Most Wanted (2 - 2) [3-4-3 vs 3-5-2]
  137. ROM Saint Étienne - The Walking Dead (0 - 2) [3-5-2 vs 3-5-2]
  138. The Rothschilds - The Walking Dead (4 - 0) [4-5-1 vs 3-4-3]
  139. ROE Public Enemies - The Walking Dead (1 - 0) [4-3-3 vs 4-4-2]
  140. Alcantara C. P. - The Walking Dead (0 - 0) [4-4-2 vs 4-4-2]
  141. The Walking Dead - Majestic 12 (1 - 2) [4-4-2 vs 4-5-1]

Age spread

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by type

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by formation

Back to top

Home formation use / success

Back to top

Skill spread

Back to top

Assists / Assisted chances produced by player

Back to top

Goals / chances produced by time

Back to top

Goals / chances scored against formation

Back to top

Away formation use / success

Back to top

About :: FAQ :: Changelog :: Last updated: Wed Oct 24 01:13:15 2012.